Building Culture Slowly: Leaders, Truth & No Ultimatums š§Ŗš£ļø
Status: Declassifiedā-āFile Archive 7 | ITH Sessions, Dressing Room Debates & The Art of Making OverĀ Breaking

Weāre back with another file from the archives.
Still connecting dots from Carlo Ancelottiās Quiet Leadership. The man keeps delivering intel.
This time, itās about how culture is BUILTāāānot announced, not imposed, but infused. Slowly. Day by day.
Thereās this thing leaders love to do. They join a new team, call an all-hands meeting, and announce the ānew culture.ā As if culture is a PowerPoint slide you can project onto a wall.
It doesnāt work that way. Ancelotti knows it:
āThe players needed to understand, as those at Milan had done, that they were part of a great clubāāābut I had to begin this process slowly, slowly, softly, softly.ā
Slowly, slowly. Softly, softly.
Let me confuse you with how I do this. šÆ
š The Dot: Slowly, Slowly, Softly, Softly
Ancelotti on culture building:
āI spoke with the players about what we would do and, day by day, we began to improve the culture of the club.ā
āWe didnāt impose any of this. We just organized things for the players and made it welcoming for them to stay, so that they would want to stay.ā
Day by day. No imposition. Make it welcoming.
Sounds nice. But what does it actually look like in practice?
The Field Reality:
I call it culture as slow poison. š§Ŗ
You donāt force it. You infuse it. Day by day. Drip by drip. Until itās in their blood.
Hereās my playbook:
š ITH Sessions (ITās HOT): We read books together. Watch leadership and team movies. Documentaries. And I MANDATE them to speak.
Hereās the blackmail: āIf the session is interactive, we close on time. If not, we go extended.ā
First few times, the team thinks Iām joking. āHe wonāt really keep us late, right?ā
Then marathon sessions happen. Weekend sessions happen.
They realize: āOh. He IS the Super Villain. He IS crazy.ā š¦¹āāļø
š Zephyr 1ā1s: Part of the slow poisoning playbook. Regular, structured, agenda belongs to them. Every conversation is a drip of culture.
š¤ Quarterly AMA Sessions: Ask Me Anything. Or as I like to call itāāāAttack Me with Anything.
Hereās what surprised me: Questions that NEVER came up in 1ā1s came up in AMAs.
Why? Even though they feel safe with me one-on-one, sometimes they need the support of numbers. Seeing teammates who feel the same gives them courage to ask the tough questions.
š¬ Netflix āFreedom and Responsibilityā: The cultural model that aligns with Kissflowās values. The bedrock of everything we build.
The Twist:
Over a period of time, through these cultural drills, I make the team a gang of people with the same mental disorder.š
Thatās not an accident. Thatās slow poison working.
Think about how Fury built SHIELD. He didnāt announce the culture in a memo. He recruited people one by one. Trained them. Tested them. Let the culture seep into them through missions and mentorship. By the time the Avengers assembled, they already FELT like a teamāāāeven though theyād never worked together.
You canāt announce culture. You canāt impose culture. You can only infuse itāāāsession by session, conversation by conversation, until it becomes who they are. š”ļø
š The Dot: Types of Leaders
Now, as youāre building culture, you need to understand something important. Not everyone leads the same wayāāāand thatās by design.
Ancelotti identifies two types:
āRonaldo is what I call a ātechnical leaderā, who leads by example; he doesnāt speak a lot but is serious, very professional and takes care of himself.ā
āRamos is what I call a āpersonality leaderā, a leader with strong character, who is never scared, never worriedāāāalways positive.ā
And he says:
āSometimes itās the players who have to be the leaders, not the manager.ā
Technical Leaders and Personality Leaders. Both essential. Both different.
The Field Reality:
I see these two types in my teams. And I keep them SEPARATEāāāby design. šÆ
DevOps:
š§ Noordeen = Technical Leader (the Tony Starkāāāspeed, systems thinking, innovation)
š± Aravindhan = Technical Leader (still active), now thinking about pursuing the Cultural Functional path in the future
QA:
š§ Santhosh = Technical Leader
š Akshaya = Cultural Functional Leader
Other companies might merge these two leadership types into one role. āYouāre the tech lead, so youāre also the people lead.ā
I donāt do that. Hereās why:
Each type has strengths. Each type has blind spots. When you pair them, their gaps cover each other.
š§ Technical Leaderās blind spots ā Covered by Cultural Functional Leader
š Cultural Functional Leaderās blind spots ā Covered by Technical Leader
They complement. They balance. Like how Tony Stark and Steve Rogers were different kinds of leadersāāāone led through innovation and brilliance, the other through values and presence. The Avengers needed BOTH.
The Twist:
I WAS a Technical Leader. In 2018, I purposely pivoted to Cultural Functionalāāāthe coach role.
I did it while I still had my best Techie years left. Not when I was fading. Not when I had no choice.
Why? Because I saw that the team needed a coach more than another player. They had enough technical strength. They needed someone to build the culture.
Ancelotti says sometimes the players have to be the leaders. I agree. But someone has to build the environment where player-leaders can emerge.
Thatās the coachās job. Thatās Furyās job. Thatās my job. š”ļø
š The Dot: Truth to Power
Culture isnāt just about slow poison and leader types. Itās also about what people are ALLOWED to say.
Ancelotti on IbrahimoviÄ:
āHe was never afraid to speak the truth to anyone, even me.ā
And heās clear about what leaders must do:
āSpeaking truth to power has to be an acceptable behaviour. Leaders have to enable it for their own benefit. It is not a ānice to haveā, it is essential.ā
Not nice to have. Essential. If your team canāt tell you the truth, youāre flying blind.
The Field Reality:
Hereās the problem Netflixās Reed Hastings describes in No Rules Rules:
āThe higher you get in an organization, the less feedback you receive, and the more likely you are to ācome to work nakedā or make another error thatās obvious to everyone but you.ā
When the office assistant screws up a coffee order and no one tells himāāāno big deal.
When the CFO screws up a financial statement and no one dares challenge itāāācrisis.
The higher you go, the more dangerous silence becomes.
How I Enable Truth to Power:
š Put feedback ON the agendaāāāIn Zephyr 1ā1s, feedback isnāt optional. Itās expected. First or last item. Separate from operational talk.
š¤ Belonging cuesāāāWhen they speak up, respond with gratitude. Appreciative tone. Eye contact. Thank them for courage. Show them: āYou spoke truth and you still belong here.ā
š¤ AMA = Attack Me with AnythingāāāQuarterly sessions where the team can challenge me publicly. Questions come up there that never came up in 1ā1s. The group gives them courage.
š« Make it non-negotiableāāāLike Hastings told his employee: āThe day you find yourself sitting on your feedback because youāre worried youāll be unpopular is the day youāll need to leave.ā
šÆ Netflix 4A Feedback SystemāāāThe structured way to give and receive feedback well.
The Twist:
But hereās the confusionāāāwhen they speak up, I donāt just nod and say āthank you for your feedback.ā š¤
Sometimes I fight them aggressivelyāāālike a coach and player debating in the dressing room. āļø
Both are true:
ā I make it SAFE to speak up
āļø But when they do, I engage, push back, debate
Why? If I just nodded at everything, theyād think I donāt care. Or worseāāātheir opinion didnāt matter enough to fight over.
When I fight back, Iām saying:
āYour opinion matters enough for me to engage. Letās battle it out.ā
Thatās respect. Dressing room style.
Think about Tony and Cap arguing in the Avengers. They fought HARD. Disagreed publicly. But that friction made them better. Fury didnāt stop those argumentsāāāhe let them happen. Because truth has to be spoken, even when itās uncomfortable. Especially when itās uncomfortable. š

Your opinion matters enough to fight over. Thatās respect.
š The Dot: No Ultimatums
Now letās talk about what happens when things get really hard. When someoneās not performing. When youāre tempted to draw a line.
Ancelotti is direct:
āIf you have to sack people then sack themāāādonāt tell them that if they lose or do a bad job youāre going to sack them. If I donāt do a good job then just fire me, but donāt give me stupid ultimatums. You are the boss, so of course you have the right to sack whoever you wantāāājust be a man about it.ā
No ādo this or else.ā Just make the call. Donāt threatenāāāact.
The Field Reality:
I donāt give up on people easily. Even when THEY give up on the system or on me.
Exit is the easiest route. Breaking is easy.
Making is not. And as a coach, I know that.
I always believe thereās something still not visible. Some blocker, some fear, some misalignment. And if we find it, we can make things instead of breaking things.
Sam Prasadās Example:
I was a jerk. Immature. Problematic. The kind of employee most managers would cut loose.
Sam took 3ā4 YEARS before I started realizing my stupidity and aligning with him.
One day I asked him: āWhy did you spend that much time on me? You couldāve sent me out and found someone more seasoned and expert.ā
His answer:
āSometimes, as a leader, thereās an intuition that saysāāāif this problematic person is aligned, heāll take the team and himself to places. And as a leader, sometimes you have to take that call.ā
He bet on the problematic person. That bet was me. š
The Reality:
Have I fired people? Yes. Itās never comfortableāāāeven when they donāt want to bounce back.
Sometimes when I want to make, THEY break with me. It stings. But I understandāāāthat happens.
When breaking happens:
š¤ Shake hands
š Wish them well
š¤ Offer to help in the future
The Twist:
This might seem like it deviates from my Super Villain character. Villains are supposed to be ruthless, right?
But hereās the thing:
āYou canāt box Super Villains with any perimeter or rules. They do what they want to do because they want to do it that way.ā
The Super Villain fights for his people. Thatās not weakness. Thatās the villainās code.
Fury could have given up on Stark. On Banner. On Romanoff. They were all problematic. Complicated. Risky bets.
He didnāt. He kept making, not breaking. And look what they built together. š¦¹āāļø
š The Dot: Unselfish Leaders
Finally, letās talk about what separates good leaders from great ones.
Ancelotti on IbrahimoviÄ:
āIbra is one of the few strikers, maybe the only one, who is just as happy when he makes an assist as he is when he scores.ā
āHe is one of the most unselfish players I have ever met, which is of massive value to the team.ā
Just as happy with an assist as a goal. Thatās rare. Most strikers live for the glory of scoring. Ibra lives for the WINāāāregardless of who gets the credit.
The Field Reality:
Sam Prasad taught me this. And I later saw MS Dhoni practice it perfectly. š
The Dhoni Model:
š When team WINS ā Dhoni credits the team. Hands over the cup in microseconds. Stays in the corner so the team takes the limelight.
š„ When team LOSES ā Takes responsibility. Faces the heat. Doesnāt throw players under the bus.
Sam told me:
āIf you score while the team loses, you might have fame for the scoreāāābut you lost as a leader. Put the team first.ā
The Dancer Story:
I was a dancer once. Years back, I FAILED in a competition. It stung. I moved on.
Later, I choreographed a team of girls. They entered the SAME competition.
They won. š
That highāāāwhen your team scores on games YOU lost in the past. Thatās the ultimate assist.
I didnāt need to be on stage. I put THEM there. And their victory felt bigger than any I could have won myself.
The Twist:
If you ask me whoās my IbrahimoviÄāāāall my bosses, fellow leaders, and coaches have been unselfish. Regardless of which field theyāre from.
They celebrated assists over goals. They put team first. They stayed in the corner when the team won.
Thatās the model I absorbed. Thatās the model I practice.
Think about Fury at the end of the first Avengers movie. Who gets the credit? The Avengers. Whoās in the shadows? Fury. He built the whole thing, and heās content to let them take the spotlight.
The best leaders donāt need the spotlight. They create itāāāfor others. š¦
šÆ The Debrief
Culture isnāt announced. Itās infused. Slowly, slowly. Softly, softly.
Hereās the operating system:
š§Ŗ Culture as slow poisonāāāITH, Zephyr, AMA, Netflix F&Rāāāuntil they become a gang with the same mental disorder
š§š Two types of leadersāāāTechnical and Cultural Functionalāāākeep them separate, let them cover each otherās gaps. Tony and Cap energy.
š£ļø Truth to power is essential, not nice-to-haveāāāput feedback on the agenda, give belonging cues, make it expected
āļø But also fight them in the dressing roomāāāif you just nod, they think you donāt care
š ļø Making over Breakingāāādonāt give up easily. Sam spent 3ā4 years on me. Fury didnāt give up on the Avengers.
š” Intuition: āIf this problematic person aligns, heāll take the team to placesā
š¦¹āāļø Super Villains canāt be boxedāāāthey fight for their people their own way
š Unselfish leaders celebrate assists over goalsāāāDhoni model, dancer story, Fury in the shadows
š¦ The best leaders donāt need the spotlightāāāthey create it for others
Culture is slow. Leadership is patient. And the best goals are the ones you set up for someone else to score.
Stay slow. Stay unselfish. Stay poisonous. š§Ŗā”
Class dismissed. ā




